Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Anyone who fantasizes about sex shouldn't be offended by Trump's comments

If a woman isn't offended, but turned on by, the thought and action of a man either fondling her nether region or entering it, ahem... then why would she be offended when a man puts to words, in a private conversation (but then leaked), what she thinks in her head or lets happen to her in the bedroom? After all, her thoughts are private, so are his.... he is condemned if his comments are made public, but what if HER thoughts about being plowed or grabbed are somehow made public? If one read 50 Shades of Grey and anyone found out about it or knows that one is into that kind of book, then how can they conceivably complain about someone makes comments in the spirit of that book to someone else in a private conversation? If it's not lewd and crude when you fantasize about it, how is it lewd and crude when someone of the opposite sex puts it to words?

Now a woman that was offended by Trump's comments might think "Well, I don't dream of a man grabbing me by the pussy." This is semantics, because in sex, a lot of grabbing goes on, whether the pussy is the target or the breasts or the butt or the thighs. So let's say you don't imagine a man grabbing you by the pussy.... surely you'd imagine OTHER sexual acts done to you by him that involve grabbing?

Take me for example, if I ever got to be with the sexy as hell Ashley Graham, her nice rear end would DEFINITELY be grabbed by yours truly. And I wouldn't mind if she grabbed me by the crotch or anywhere else for that matter.

To see what Ashley Graham looks like, click here.