Everything is relative

If everything is relative, then what about the phrase "everything is relative"? Is that phrase true for some, but not others?

More than two genders and more than two unique genitalia?

It is well known that men and women, both different genders, have different genitalia. Some people think that there are more than two genders. If there were truly a 3rd, etc, gender, wouldn't they have their own unique genitalia? Or do they identify their pecker as some unique genitalia?

What I think about the Wikileaks and whether the files are legit or not

Wikileaks either themselves hacked the email accounts OR got sent emails from people who did the hacking of Podesta's email, Hillary's, etc. Either way, the documents are REAL. So saying that "well, they aren't legit" for whatever reason is a very poor spin and deflectionary tactic.

After all, since the democrats cheered when Wikileaks were leaking BUSH documents, that suggests they're legit from the Dems perspective.... yet when it's THEM that is hurt by the leaks, they say "well, it's not legit, cause...."

Also, Hillary, during the debate, said something about "Well, if you look at what I said in context...." which is a way of admitting that the leaks are LEGIT.

John McCain dumped Trump for hot mic comments, but has one of his own (VIDEO)

"But Donald Trump’s behavior this week, concluding with the disclosure of his demeaning comments about women and his boasts about sexual assaults, make it impossible to continue to offer even conditional support for his candidacy. (Wife) Cindy, with her strong background in human rights and respect for women, fully agrees with me in this." #JohnMcCain #DonaldTrump

Here is the article from which the quote above comes from:

http://www.newsweek.com/mccain-pulls-support-wont-vote-trump-507892

Here is the video that I'm talking about where McCain curses out a female: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCXOZpwT2ek

Anyone who fantasizes about sex shouldn't be offended by Trump's comments

If a woman isn't offended, but turned on by, the thought and action of a man either fondling her nether region or entering it, ahem... then why would she be offended when a man puts to words, in a private conversation (but then leaked), what she thinks in her head or lets happen to her in the bedroom? After all, her thoughts are private, so are his.... he is condemned if his comments are made public, but what if HER thoughts about being plowed or grabbed are somehow made public? If one read 50 Shades of Grey and anyone found out about it or knows that one is into that kind of book, then how can they conceivably complain about someone makes comments in the spirit of that book to someone else in a private conversation? If it's not lewd and crude when you fantasize about it, how is it lewd and crude when someone of the opposite sex puts it to words?

Now a woman that was offended by Trump's comments might think "Well, I don't dream of a man grabbing me by the pussy." This is semantics, because in sex, a lot of grabbing goes on, whether the pussy is the target or the breasts or the butt or the thighs. So let's say you don't imagine a man grabbing you by the pussy.... surely you'd imagine OTHER sexual acts done to you by him that involve grabbing?

Take me for example, if I ever got to be with the sexy as hell Ashley Graham, her nice rear end would DEFINITELY be grabbed by yours truly. And I wouldn't mind if she grabbed me by the crotch or anywhere else for that matter.

To see what Ashley Graham looks like, click here.

Trump's vulgar comments VS losing America forever (your choice)

What Hillary Clinton will do if President is far worse than what Trump said about women 11 years ago..... and it's too late to replace Trump. Trump is all we got. And we stand to lose America if Hillary is elected. Therefore the choice is Trump.

Trump's vulgar comments vs what's at stake in America

We only have two choices. The stakes are high. If Hillary wins, we lose our country. If Trump wins, we get our country back.

Do the vulgar comments made by Trump somehow erase this fact? How on earth could any sane person think that those facts are erased because of what Trump said about a decade ago?

Besides, Hillary left four Americans to die in Benghazi. She smeared the rape victims of her husband. 

TRUMP PENCE 2016!!!!!!

Your opinions and my opinions affect lives

The more an opinion affects others, the less it is "just a mere opinion". Whether good or bad, opinions often affect other people drastically depending on how they manifest themselves in all of our lives.

If it saves just one life, then it's worth it (Guns)

Some liberals say "If gun control saves just one life, it'll be worth it".

Consider this phrase: "A father with a gun can stop his daughter from being murdered by someone. If having a gun saves just one life, it'll be worth it..."

Liberal minority inner city ghetto communities

If, within your own liberal communities, under your own liberal leadership, your own liberal influences and liberal ideologies permeating your communities.... if with those things you STILL cannot get out of the crappy life you have into one that is better for your happiness, prosperity and safety..... how on earth can you continue to say that liberalism is a good thing?

For liberals who love socialism

If socialism is so great, how come you won't create cities from scratch based on it?

Reparations for slavery

This is a comment I left on a white person's post mentioning reparations for slavery:

"Even if you did own a slave, you'd only owe reparations to that individual. No other person of that individual's ethnicity would be owed anything from you."

If you don't like to debate, you need to read this

When the issue is national security, that's an issue that affects any one of us potentially and potentially people we know. Even if it's not us or people we know, such as with 9/11, it's regarding the lives of people who don't deserve the breach in national security that affects them. As such, warning others about the dangers of electing someone such as Hillary (who left four Americans to die in Benghazi) may lead to a debate, but consider what the alternatives are.

If you don't like debating others no matter the topic, you'll want to read this

If someone disagrees with you on what is and what is not a threat to someone (anyone), wouldn't you want to debate them to hopefully change their mind so they see the threat and can take proper action?

There is a diverse set of peoples in this country with diverse problems. So it's not just what hits home for you that you'd want to warn people about and inevitably start a debate over, it's that you care for people who have nothing to do with you that you'd want to warn about danger.

And when you warn people about danger they face, they may disagree with you and when they do, a debate starts. Sometimes debating goes hand in hand with caring.

Debating with people about threats to their freedom and safety

If you care for your freedom, you'll want a gov't that follows the Constitution.  If others vote for policies that infringe on the Constitution, they are advocating for policies that infringe on your freedom.  The natural thing to do when someone advocates for what infringes on your freedom is to debate them so there is a chance they'll advocate for safer policies for you.  If you care about you, you’ll debate others on the chance they might come around to advocating policies that are safer for you.

In other words, if there is a threat to your safety, and you can prevent it by getting others to see how their policies are dangerous, wouldn’t you try to fend off the threat by debating them?  I’m talking about the kind of threats that haven’t happened yet, but will happen somewhere down the line.

Politics is about freedom and safety, etc.  If you care about the diverse communities that face diverse issues all over this country, then if you see some kind of a threat that they may face, wouldn’t you want to warn them?  If you’re into warning them, then you’re someone who doesn’t mind debating them because it is for their own good.

I had to debate people all the time when I was trying to get out of an abusive relationship.  I hated doing it, but I had to, otherwise how was I going to get out of the hell I had been living in for so long?  No, this isn’t political, but the issue of getting people to see the light where they only see the dark is something common to causes that are both political and non political.

Trump's 2nd Amendment statement (regarding Hillary) in it's proper context

Said the Founders in the Declaration of Independence: "when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security" But if Trump says it regarding how to respond to a despotic Clinton administration, according to the liberals who never read the Declaration, somehow he's a bad man?

Powerful, hateful, murderous racists? A few thoughts on that

If we were as hateful and as powerful and as murder minded and as racist and in control of the key institutions of America as Democrats say…. how come there are still many communities out there with minorities still living in them? Wouldn’t people as described by Democrats be able to murder many, most, or all minorities and get away with it?

One more thing: We are said to be powerful. We are also said to use coded language to express our thoughts about minorities. Since when do powerful people use coded language to express their thoughts about any given topic?

Disagreeing with a lifestyle doesn't mean you want to oppress them

If a liberal thinks I want to oppress LGBT because I disagree with their lifestyle, that liberal is adding something to the mix that wasn't there. I merely disagree with their lifestyle. Since when is disagreeing with someone oppression of them? After all, liberals disagree with me on this yet according to them, they're not oppressing me, right? Right!

When non whites do it, it's "Social Justice" but when whites do it, it's "Stereotyping"!! Double standards!!

Many non whites have no problem whatsoever calling whites thieves, killers, rapists, corrupt, racists, haters, etc.  But WOE BE US if we do the same thing to them! When we do the same thing to them, we’re “stereotyping”.  We’re “bigoted” if we do the same thing to them.

But when they do it, it’s “social justice”.  Isn’t that a double standard?  And aren’t double standards in race relations hateful?  When whites have double standards, we’re called racist.

I think I’ll leave it at that.

Your culture influencing other cultures to be more like you is not a bad thing

I'm sorry, but when blacks complain about whites borrowing their culture (or in their words, "appropriating"), they don't seem to be realizing that we do so BECAUSE WE LIKE THEIR CULTURE. No, instead, they see it as theft. Since when is "I like your culture, so I'll copy aspects of it" theft and when is it bad to borrow what you like? Either way, it's not a bad thing for whites to be proudly influenced by blacks. This is further proof that there is less racism! Isn't less racism and it's proof a good thing?

All cultures have throughout history borrowed from other cultures that they've come into contact with. It is RACIST to say that whites can't borrow from blacks!

Cultural norms

Any culture that:

1.)  Beats women
2.)  Beats on minorities.
3.)  Beats on gays.

is a bad culture.

Islam is such a culture.

Now before you call me an islamophobe, consider that I'm clearly not sexist, I'm clearly not a bigot against minorities and I'm clearly not homophobic.  So shouldn't THAT carry some weight with you who are so ready to defend islam?

Liberals say it's ok to hate the following

You can hate whites.

You can hate men.

You can hate straight people.

You can hate Christians.


But you better not hate:

Non-whites.
Women.
LGBT.
Non-Christians.

That's a double standard.  When you use that double standard, you are borrowing the tactics of "bigoted" straight white Christian men, which makes YOU a bigot.

Minorities got screwed out of a good education

Fact:  People, whether minority or not, are not born well educated.  They have to work hard to obtain a good education.  (Exceptions are people like Einstein, who probably had an easier time compared to most of us).

Fact:  Minority kids more often than not get screwed when it comes to education in schools in their communities all the way until the time they graduate high school.

Fact:  People are not born automatically qualified for graduation from any level of schooling, from the grade school levels to the college/university/graduate school levels.

Fact:  To get hired by a high paying job, you have to get a good education as qualification.

Fact:  People are not born automatically qualified for a high paying job.

Fact:  It’s not the employers fault that most of you got a lousy education which in turn screwed you out of being qualified for a high paying job.

You needed a good education from the start, didn’t get one, you apply for a job that requires one but blame the employer’s “racism” that you didn’t get the job?  It's not because of racism, it's because of your lack of education!  Someone other than your employer is to blame!

Are all cultures compatible? Or are they incompatible?

Are all cultures incompatible or are all of them compatible?  Or are only some compatible with one another?

Can incompatible cultures peacefully co-exist with one another?  If yes, how would that work?  What would need to happen for peace to happen between the two?  If they can’t co-exist peacefully, how come?  What would make that happen?  Would it be easy to reconcile the two culture’s differences, whether they are compatible or not?

Are hateful cultures compatible with loving/caring cultures?  Is there such a thing as a “loving culture” or a “hateful culture”?  If there is, then how can love coexist with hate?

Can Liberal/Progressive culture peacefully exist with Conservative/Republican culture?

After all, both liberals and Conservatives have different views on what’s hateful, on what’s loving, on what’s tolerant, on what’s just, on what’s not just, on how to solve conflict, etc.

Now how would two different cultures solve conflict?  If you have differing visions on how to get justice implemented, you will forever be in conflict because the other side will feel cheated when you win and will try to rectify (according to their ideology) the lack of justice.  And vice versa.  This is conflict.  Conflict is not peace.

Liberal logic: Peaceful people can't be trusted with guns

Liberal logic: Peaceful people can't be trusted with guns.

If peaceful people can’t be trusted with guns and are deprived of guns, how would they defend against someone with a gun?  After all, seconds count when the police are minutes away.  Plus, the police can’t be everywhere.

Guns & Discrimination

Sure, you could say that armed guards, the police and the secret service have the uninfringeable authority to have guns.  So do we, it’s called the 2nd Amendment.  You could also say that you trust them to have guns and that trust is crucial to allowing someone to have guns.  We millions upon millions of people aren’t convicted murderers and you don’t trust us?  Why wouldn’t you trust anyone who doesn’t have it in them to murder?

You’ll hire armed guards and you don’t know them from Adam or Jane.  Yet you trust them.  They have a good record of not murdering anyone with their guns or the guns their employment gives them for work.  We have a good record too of not murdering anyone too, but you won’t trust us?  

Clearly you favor one group of people over another even though they meet the same essential and crucial criteria for trust and safety with guns.

That’s called discrimination.

Just because you disagree doesn't mean you hate

Fact:  Many parents don’t hate their children when they say they’re against and disagree with their children having sex at too early an age or doing drugs (at any age), or whether or not their children grow up with different world views and/or politics.  

Fact:  I have a friend who is pro LGBT.  I disagree with and am against her way of thinking on this issue.  We are good friends in spite of both of us being against each other’s way of thinking and disagreeing with each other on this issue.  Being good friends with one another clearly isn’t something where hate is involved.

Fact:  Years ago, I had a co-worker who hated George W. Bush.  Yet I still had a crush on her even though I disagreed with and was against her way of thinking.  Clearly if someone has a crush on someone else, they don’t hate them.

Fact:  I was a huge heavy metal fan at one point (and to some extent, still am).  My Grandfather (born in the early part of the 20th century) wasn’t.  He may have been against my choice in music and disagreed with my choice in listening to it so much, but we had a strong bond in spite of our differences.  When you have a strong bond with someone, that’s clearly not hate.

Fact: I know someone who wants to move to a different state in the US, but his wife doesn’t.  They disagree with each other and are against each other’s way of thinking.  But they’re still happily married.  Being happily married isn’t a thing where hate is involved.

So being against and disagreeing with someone doesn’t necessarily mean that you “hate” them. If hate comes into the picture, I think the biggest reason might be the interpersonal relations between liberals and Conservatives.  Some on both sides are fascist in their interpersonal relations.  They might also be a bit tyrannical.  Or they might choose to censor or ban someone or some group.  Being shouted down is another one.  Stealing political yard signs might also cause some to hate. 

But being against someone’s way of doing things or disagreeing with their point of view doesn’t always mean that you hate them.  

Hard Work

Granted, I believe liberals are wrong on a variety of topics, but for the sake of the argument, let’s say they’re right on those topics.

From their perspective:

1.)  They have to have facts to combat Conservatives.

2.)  They have to work hard to defeat Conservatives.

3.)  They have to have certain ethics that Conservatives don’t have.

4.)  They have to put in a lot of time to defeat us.

5.)  They have to have patience in defeating us.

In other words, hard work.

So when it’s liberals battling Conservatives, it’s called hard work.  It’s not talked about in a bad way.

But the minute the battle changes from liberals vs Conservatives to blacks learning in school, suddenly hard work is called “acting white” by many of them.  I wonder why?

Accusation equals guilt without question?

Liberals think: Because the accusation of bigotry was made, that they automatically have bulletproof evidence. Thus when the accused defend themselves, they're foolish.

So an accusation is automatic guilt?

I thought individual bigoted white people used that kind of thinking? Do liberals mean to be like individual white bigots?

If you picked up a loaded gun

If you picked up a loaded gun, will it hurt or kill you upon doing so? No? Then why do you blame it as though it chose to kill (which it can't do) when it was the evil person who chose to kill people? Mind you, often the police are minutes away and that’s all the time a would-be murderer needs to kill you, so having a gun to save your life and stop the killer is important!!

What is a gun's primary purpose?

If you think that a gun's primary purpose is to murder someone, then you are telling me what I intend to use one for. Is lying about my intentions to my face the way to debate me or anyone on this subject? I live close to a bad neighborhood where there are shootings every once in a while. If I buy a gun, it's primary purpose in my life would be for self defense.

The protected groups are immune from criticism

Because you are black, latino, gay, lesbian, transgender, muslim, etc, I can’t say that you are corrupt or abusive.  That would be “bigoted”.

Well, that’s what liberals would have us believe.

And guess what?  Because getting called bigoted effectively cancels out the accusation of being corrupt or abusive, that means that these protected groups I listed above can do what I accuse them of and get away with it.

But according to liberals, any accusation of abuse or corruption is all a lie.  All for ONE reason: the people I mentioned are black, latino, gay, lesbian, transgender, muslim, etc.

Since when does one’s status or classification in this world make accusations of abuse or corruption a lie?  Didn’t straight white Christian men at one point try to use that logic?  If it’s bad logic when they use it, how can it somehow be good logic when you liberals use it?

A long post about guns

Someone might say:  “Guns are so dangerous that they’ll kill you if you pick them up. You don’t even need to keep your finger on or near the trigger to be in danger of the gun hurting or killing you.”

8,583 people have been murdered by guns of various types in America in 2011.  That’s a mighty big number, isn’t it?  I guess what makes it seem like a big number is the fact that it’s big compared to the number of people we associate with on a regular basis.  If the amount of murders where guns are used is any indication of guns being dangerous, then from this perspective, guns are definitely dangerous.

What if you compared the 8,583 gun murders in 2011 to the population of the country (nearly 324 MILLION) instead of your relatively small social circle?  What if you compared the amount of gun related murders to the opposite of gun related murders, which is vastly larger in comparison? That completely changes things. The number 8,583 doesn’t seem so huge after that change in perspective.  If the amount of murders where guns are used is any indication of guns being dangerous, then from this perspective, guns are not dangerous because they are used on a small fraction of the people in America.  Go ahead.  Do the math.  The number is VERY small.

Ok, so the number of people in America wasn’t 324 million back in 2011.  So what?  Maybe it was a few million less.  Does that change the fact that there were over 300 million people in America in 2011?  Not by a long shot.

But you say “What about the cities where guns kill lots of people daily?”  Chicago would be one example.  To that I say “Bad guys will always be able to get guns through either legal means or, if guns are ever permanently banned across the entire USA (not just the cities), they will get them from the black market.  It’s at this point that only they and the police will have guns.  And this leaves minority families living in the cities with a severe disadvantage: What if their homes are broken into? The police are minutes away and often that’s all a murderer needs to kill one or more members of a family.  It’s during those minutes that a good guy using a gun can stop a bad guy from hurting or killing the good guy and his or her family.  And whether or not it’s rare that guns are used in self defense, the fact is that there are a lot of break ins that are dangerous for the victims.

But you say “My home has never been broken into before and likely won’t in the future, so your argument doesn’t hold water.”  To that I say “We don’t know what the future holds.  We don’t know who will be next.  You seem to be saying that you know it won’t be you and as a result, you won’t take the precautions to keep your household safe.  

But you say “I don’t want to kill someone, even in self defense!”  Either way you look at it, when someone comes at you with a gun, someone is getting hurt or killed.  The innocent victim (you) should be the one to remains unhurt, not the attacker.  Look, we’re talking about you defending yourself.  How is that a bad thing?  The last I checked, it’s not against the law to defend yourself.

But you say “if we can stop just one gun related murder, then it will be worth it to have gun control.”  Black markets which go around gun control laws aside, to your statement I say “One way to stop a gun related murder is for people like you (who care a lot about others) to have guns for the defense of human life.  You might say “But if guns are involved, a human will get hurt or die!”  That’s right.  Better the aggressor than you, wouldn’t you say?  If not, I wonder if you really care about yourself and others.  Or perhaps you just haven’t thought things through yet.

But you say “what about suicides?” A suicide is similar to a murder because each involves the death of someone.  So let’s equate them as the same for the sake of the argument.  Does that change anything else I’m saying here?  No?  Then why do you use it as an argument for gun control?

You also say “but even one gun related murder is a tragedy.  Guns must be highly regulated or banned outright.”  My response is “Not being able to use a gun for self defense is also a tragedy. You having no gun in a situation in which you are the intended victim means you have less of a chance of surviving because it won’t be there to help defend your life.”

You say “but guns are hardly ever used for self defense.” Fact: There are murders in this world. Fact: We don’t know who will be next.  Since we don’t know who will be next, it could be us or people around us.  Don’t you want a super effective way of stopping an attacker from potentially seriously harming or killing you or your loved ones or anyone for that matter?

You say “But you can reason with someone before you kill them in self defense so hopefully they don’t murder you”.  You could and there is a time/place for that. Yet if they’re in the middle of pulling out their gun to kill you OR if they already have it aimed at you, they are past the point at which they can be reasoned with.  At that point, shooting them is your best bet at you (the innocent person in all this) staying safe.

You say “You don’t need more than ten rounds”  I say “What if the bad guy has more rounds than you?  Sure, it only takes one shot to kill and stop them, but what if it takes more than that (it’s not always the first shot that kills, after all) and you suddenly run out while they have more rounds and wham, you get murdered because of a lack of rounds?  What if it’s a firefight where you need more than ten rounds?

If guns were so dangerous, then I’d be killed by them even by just picking them up in my hands.

Sources:

For gun deaths in 2011, I got the info here:  https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8

For the population number, I got the info here:  http://www.census.gov

Guns are dangerous? Really?

If guns are so dangerous, why does it take a mean spirited person to make them go off?

If guns are outlawed

If guns are outright outlawed, will people still be able to get their hands on them?  Will only the bad guys and police have them?  What will non murderous minded people do for self defense?

Guns are dangerous, right? Here's my take

If guns are so dangerous, shouldn't I be scared to arm myself with one?  After all, them being dangerous would mean they'd shoot me while in my hands!

If guns are so dangerous, then how come...

If guns are so dangerous, then how come a vast majority of them (millions upon millions) aren't used in the murder or injury of innocents?

Racism is a mindset

Racism is a mindset. You don't need to have power to have this mindset. So to say that minorities can't be racist because they don't have power is just an excuse to let them get away with being racist.

Hate Speech

Hate speech. The simplest form of hate speech is "I hate you"

So what if someone hates me? Yes, it will annoy me a bit, but I wouldn't censor someone over it. Well, I don't have the power to, but I also wouldn't report it to FaceBook if someone said they hated me OR if they said hateful things about me or my preferred candidate or a group of people that I advocate for.

Only weak people would report something like that. Admittedly, when I graduated high school back in '98, I was the weak type that might have reported "hate speech". But people I knew would have none of it and eventually I grew much stronger, so I don't report stuff that offends me. Believe me, plenty of what liberals say offends me. Yet it does not cross my mind to report them!

I move on with my day after processing what happened.  Sometimes it takes a little while, but I move on with life.  Shouldn’t liberals move on with theirs?

Bottom line:  If you post hate speech that is specific to me, I won’t report you.  Now how come many liberals aren’t like this?  Because many of them are weak.  Do we really want weak people in charge of our country?  Do we really want people in charge of our country that refuse to move on from a problem where they were offended?  Is being offended and not moving on from the issue really the hallmark of a great leader, a great moral guide, someone to look up to?

When I was a child, I wouldn’t move on from issues much the same way many liberals don’t move on with their issues.

They can say it, but we can't? Double standards abound!!

The phrase “I’m so sick of whites” or “I stay away from whites” is seen as liberals to be backed up by their experiences with us.  Sure, WE may feel they’re paranoid much of the time, but that’s not the point here.

What I want to know is why can’t we say the same about them?  When they say it about us, it’s not racist, but when we say it about them, it suddenly is?  What specific criteria do they use to justify this double standard?

It's not oppressive to require someone to show ID to buy cigarettes or open a bank account, but...

If it's not oppressive to require showing one's ID to set up a bank account or for young people to buy cigarettes, how is it oppressive to require those same people to show ID to vote?

DNA vs What gender people feel they are at any given moment

DNA doesn't change it's mind about what gender it is, but apparently some people do change their minds on what gender they are. How can DNA have it wrong, all because some people have contradictory feelings?

Identity

If identifying as a woman "justifies" a man going into a woman's restroom and since it also means that people can't stop that man, I guess the following is true: You can identify as someone (or some thing) that someone else is and nobody can stop you from acting out their part.

Ok then:  I identify as Mark Zuckerberg.  The banks better not discriminate when I want to withdraw more money than Janson Smithers has in savings.

Are guns accomplices to murder? If that's true, what about...?

If gun sellers are accomplices of crime, what about their guns that are used to save lives?  What about their guns that aren't used for cold blooded murder?

Gender fluidity

A penis is not a female body part and never will be. It always has been the hallmark of the male gender. To suggest otherwise, you'd have your facts wrong.

The idea of gender being fluid is thus wrong.

Is it possible to hate someone and not be a bigot?

Is it possible to hate someone and not be a bigot?

I hate racists.
I hate sexists.
I hate corrupt politicians.
I hate the establishment GOP.
I hate child molestors.
I hate rapists.
I hate people who take advantage of others.
I hate liars.
I hate deadbeat dads.

As I just got done proving, it is possible to hate and not be a bigot. So how come liberals treat the issue as though all hate is bad and that all hate is based on bad reasoning when quite often, it's based on bad experiences with bad individuals?

If gender is a societal construct, how come...

If gender is a societal construct, how come I have different parts (both internal and external) than roughly half the population of people? Is THAT difference a "societal construct"? Is the fact that I can't have babies grow inside of me a "societal construct"? Is the fact that I can't breast feed a baby a "societal construct"? Is the fact that I don't have PMS a "societal construct"? Is the fact that I don't need mammograms a "societal construct"? Is the fact that I don't have a vagina a "societal construct"?

If gender is such a fluid thing, then how come I was born with clearly distinct parts from roughly have the population aka females? I can understand how people would think, from a mental point of view, how gender is a societal construct only in that people have wild crazy and stupid ideas. But in the ways that I just pointed out, one by one, it is CLEAR that gender is NOT a societal construct.

Safe Spaces

Since my parents divorce 23 years ago, I've been through emotional HELL. Yet you don't see me demanding a safe space in public, do you? How is it that I am strong enough to not require a "safe space" like those idiots in college do?

If I can do it, with all the hell and emotional torment I've been through, surely these pansies can do it too, right?

I guess not. Since they can't do without their safe spaces, what enabled us two very similar creatures to end up with such wildly different demands (or on my case, lack of demands) on the public regarding safe spaces?

Immigration is a thing people do, not a race

Illegal immigration (or to liberals, just plain ole immigration) isn't a race, it's a thing people do. But since it's so closely associated with hispanics, no wonder they think it's racist to oppose them. After all, for whites to deny non-whites what they want is to liberals very "racist".

But how is it racist for a white person to deny a non-white person what they desire? All the evidence a liberal has is a difference in skin color/ethnicity. And that's not enough evidence to say whether it's racist or not. You have to go DEEPER than that for the answer!!

"F*ck them"?

If I say "f*ck you" or "f*ck them" I'm not yet giving a reason for my use of the word "f*ck" to address "them". So to call me hateful or my favorite "bigoted" is to assume to have access to knowledge you don't have. That is, until I give you access by telling you WHY I said what I did. What matters is why I said "f*ck them" as opposed to merely saying "f*ck them". So was the reason based on their character? Was the reason based on my experience with them and how they’ve treated people like me over the years?

Culture

A culture that beats on women vs a culture that doesn't beat on women. And liberals
STILL say that all cultures are equal?

A culture that oppresses blacks vs a culture that doesn't oppress blacks. And liberals
STILL say that all cultures are equal?

A culture that beats up LGBT vs a culture that doesn't beat up LGBT. And liberals
STILL say that all cultures are equal?

A culture that has gov't controlled and censored news vs one that doesn't. And liberals
STILL say that all cultures are equal?

If I were against immigrants, how come...

If I were against immigrants, how come I emphasize that they come here legally?

If I were against immigrants, how come I'm proud of my Italian immigrant ancestors?

If I were against immigrants, how come one of my favorite pundits is an immigrant?

If I were against immigrants, how come I'm grateful that my Italian ancestors came here from Italy?

If I were against immigrants, how come I'm grateful that my German grandmother came here from Germany?

Islamophobia

Since the USA is said by liberals to be islamophobic, how come the muslim refugees so desperately want to be here?

The Democrat establishment isn't homophobic, right?

If the Democrat establishment isn't homophobic, how come they don't encourage more LGBT to run for POTUS?

Safe spaces for millenial college students

Dear Millenial College Students: Is it possible to make the entire world a safe space for you?

Dear Millenial College Students: What will you do if the entire world won't create a safe space for you?

Dear Millenial College Students: What if part of what you define as a safe space isn't considered a safe space by someone else who wants a safe space?

Dear Millenial College Students: Why don't I want a safe space for me? Keep in mind that only I know the answer, no amount of theorizing on your part can come close to the truth.

Democrats aren't racist.... right?

If Democrats aren't racist, then how come they don't have more African American candidates running for POTUS?

Why won't the Democrat establishment push for more minority POTUS candidates?

Democrats keep talking about how we Conservatives only vote for white men.  Sorry, but as an individual white man, I have no power over who runs nor do I have any power over who becomes the nominee. So when you accuse me as an individual of not wanting to vote for a black man, you clearly don’t grasp what I just said.  If Thomas Sowell ran for President (and were young enough to do so), you better bet your butt I’d vote for him!  He’s one of the main reasons I’m getting my life going after years of being stuck in a rut! So how can I be racist?

Well let's talk about how many black men or women the Dems have pushed to run for President.  How many black men or women even run for President in the first place?  Very very few.  And to make matters worse, there are far fewer blacks in America to choose from as opposed to the many millions upon millions more whites to choose from.

You don't see the Democrat establishment pushing for too many minorities to run for President.  How come? Do they not trust minorities?  Based on how they don’t push for minorities to run for President, time after time, considering that actions speak louder than words, you’d soon get the idea that the Dem establishment doesn’t trust minorities because of the color of their skin and might perhaps even consider them inferior.  After all, someone who is “inferior” isn’t someone the crooked establishment would want as President.

Isn’t rejecting someone because of the color of their skin…. racist?  Hey you, Democrat establishment, I’m talking to YOU!

And since you Democrats set the narrative on race in this country, since the culture we live in is so liberal, then it is up to you to talk about this gaping hole in your rhetoric vs your actions.  I don’t hear the Democrat establishment talk about getting more black Presidents.  Forget about us Conservatives, we don’t matter according to you.  Our opinions aren’t valid.  But if you ignore the gaping hole in YOUR actions (or lack of action in promoting a black candidate) then YOU are racist!

At the time that I write this, two old white people (basically, stereotypes of my race) are running for President on the Democrat side.  I find it ironic that any non-white person can complain about white Conservatives being racist for only voting for old white men yet there being two old white people running to be a Democrat POTUS time after time.

Hate

Liberals are quick to say that it's bad to hate and that there's no good reason to be that way. NO GOOD REASON... as they say. No ifs ands or buts about it, they say.

Did they EVER stop for a moment to realize that they HATE racism, sexism, islamophobia, homophobia, etc? See, there are good reasons to hate. But you have to have legit reasons. And hating someone because they are a bigot is a GOOD reason to hate them!

Importance of knowing American history

People say "you don't know me" when they're criticized. And that implies that you ought to know their history. They imply that their history is important to know before you make any snap judgements about them. Well, what about American history being studied so that people don't make snap judgements about America?

Liberals hate conservatives, conservatives hate liberals. The amount of anger in each side is palpable. Liberals will report you and have you banned on Facebook.

But conservatives will let the liberal rant without reporting them.

Why?

For me, the thought just doesn't occur to me, probably because the idea of freedom of speech (including that which I feel is HATEFUL, and much of liberal speech IS hateful) is so ingrained in me.

Plunder, trauma, brutalizing, etc

Every culture at one point in world history brutalized another culture. Every culture at one point in world history enslaved another race. Every culture at one point in world history plundered another culture. Every culture at one point in world history traumatized another culture. It's not just the white man that is guilty of this. To say it or imply it is VERY ignorant of world history!!

Also, white people in Europe through the ages have also warred with one another, they've invaded one another, they've plundered one another. So to act like they only assaulted non-whites is ignoring obvious european history!!

University of Oklahoma: White People Singing Rihanna a ‘Microaggression’

“Human relations theory” students at the state-funded university are being taught that
they can no longer sing pop-singer Rihanna’s songs because they are white. In a lesson on “privilege” and “microaggressions,” the students were taught that having white students
sing songs of black singers is “insulting” and “racist” because the white students have more privilege than the black students have."

I would have thought they'd see it like this: "Gee, they obviously like Rihanna's music. I
think it's neat they pay tribute to a black woman in this way!" But no, it's "RACIST" to
them! They are so PARANOID as to what's racist and what's not! WOW!

Click here for the article.

Mark Zuckerberg thinks love can stop ISIS

If love could stop bullying, then it could also stop ISIS. But since it has no chance of stopping something small like bullying, what chance would it have of stopping something big like ISIS?  Mark Zuckerberg, you need to realize just how foolish you sound.

By the way, I was bullied back in High School years ago.  A loving and caring approach didn't work with the bullies.  It won't work with ISIS.

What you can do and what we can't do

You can:

Call us racist.

Call us criminals.

Call us uneducated.

Not trust us.

Judge us as worthless based on the content of our character.

Say you’ve had bad experiences with us.

Obsess on our “racist” tendencies without “having issues”.
Call us names.
Avoid us when we walk on the sidewalk.
Criticize our culture in all sorts of ways.
Criticize our lack of morals.
Obsess on our transgressions.

But if we say or do any of that about you, then we're racist.

If it's fair for you to do it to us, then it's fair for us to do the same to you.  Click here for a list of me doing the same thing to you.  And should you not like what I'm doing, then you obviously want double standards to exist.

Don't double standards exacerbate bad relations between groups of people?

Two crusaders

If a white person spends a lot of time writing on how he is treated by racist
minorities, he’s “got issues”. But a minority who spends a lot of time on
matters of race is a “crusader”. Why the double standard? Are whites
seen as second class citizens by those who set the narrative?

By the content of their character (updated)

One time I said "Gesundheit" to a little black girl after she sneezed, with her mother near by.  I translated for her because she looked confused.  The mother then ranted negatively about God and then somehow connected that with how "all white people need to be killed."  When I used a different word than killed, or whatever word she used (this was a number of years ago now), she argued with me as though there was a difference.  Bottom line: She said something that is racist in front of another minority that was there and that other minority just ignored it.  It took all of my being to not lose my temper.

Years ago when I was living in Hartford CT, I said "I hate Hartford".  I got called prejudiced. But the person, a minority, didn't get to hear my reasoning. She had already made up her mind. Her mind shut off after hearing “I hate Hartford”.  Never mind that Hartford is way more violent than where I grew up. Never mind that people there aren't nearly as polite as where I grew up. But that's why I hated Hartford. 

One time I got censored on FaceBook for saying that blacks are slaves to the liberal ideology.  I couldn’t use FB, not even to post ON MY OWN PAGE, for a day.  How on earth can these babies claim to be tough on us when they’re such wussies in the circumstances I told you about?  Only a wuss would want someone censored after being offended!  I can’t tell you how many times I am offended by liberals, but I don’t want to censor them.  It just does NOT cross my mind!

Another time I got told (by a guilty white liberal) that it was racist to want to study my own culture after having been inspired by minorities as a result of seeing many of them say and do the same. How is it racist to want to study your own people when you don’t know much about them?

If a white person says that non-whites are to some degree racist or fully racist, we will get called "racist".  Is it racist to them to make blacks look bad? Really… grow up!

To have high standards in education is seen as racist by many.

Affirmative action. Let's say I'm going for a job that will get me out of the poorhouse and I get overlooked in favor of a minority. AFTER ALL MY STRUGGLES and I get this (hypothetically speaking at this stage)? If it's bad when it happens to minorities, even if it's only ONE vestige, it's bad when it happens to us (even if it's only one vestige)!

I once saw a parody video of Super Mario Brothers on YouTube with Michael Jackson playing the part of Mario (click here for video). I laughed my ass off and told my black friend about it. Nonchalantly, he called that "racist". Laughing at a black man? How is that racist? It can only be racist depending on what the reason is! TALK ABOUT PARANOID! If I were laughing at slavery, that would be racist. But not this!! Plus, it seemed his accusation was more out of routine measures than genuine outrage. Racism requires real outrage on the part of the righteous warrior, am I right?

I was watching a movie called Angels in the Outfield, one that I loved at the time. I remember saying "I don't remember there being any African American Angels." I had to get out of there because my safety and well being was in danger. Keep in mind that this was at least my second time seeing the movie and I had just seen something I hadn't noticed before.  

And how about this:  When will people call out racist non-white comedians and guilty white liberal comedians for their racially charged jokes against white people?  It happens all the time when the jokes are against non-whites!  In fact, I bet some comedians SELF CENSOR!

Non-whites can have "black pride" or "hispanic pride" but the minute we hear "white pride" many, including lots of white Conservatives, get their panties in a wad. WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD?

Liberals call out the KKK on their evil-ness, but not the Black Panthers.  How come whites don’t get that same level of vigilance?

A non-white obsessed with race is a crusader, but a white person obsessed with race “has issues.”  Yet another double standard!!

There are countless other examples of transgressions that escape my memory at this moment.

And LIBERAL non-whites wonder why they’re looked at as mindless/alarming people who lash out when their fragile egos are shattered by Conservative talking points!  Never mind, they don’t “wonder” because their minds are so warped, they “think they know”.  They think it’s racism. They “know” it’s racism. I think they’ve been indoctrinated and have been paranoid for too long.  It’s because of these reasons that they are looked at the way they are, not their skin color.  In other words, “By the content of their character, not their skin color”.  Just as Martin Luther King Jr said and would have wanted.  Think about this: We are finally judging them by the content of their character instead of their skin color and we STILL get called racist as though this were still the 50s!

Then you have Conservative non-whites.  These people are a treasure because they go through SO much.  They are called traitors to their race when the opposite is true.  They get called all sorts of nasty names.  And I’m pretty sure they feel like they have to be in the closet regarding their views when around their fellow non-whites.  That part I can’t confirm for sure because I’ve never asked.  But it does make sense.  (NOTE: Where I live, there are few Conservative minorities, so good luck finding the needle in the haystack!!)

Now just to show that I’m not racist (cause you know the libs will accuse me of this), here are a list of minorities I like and respect:

Ben Carson.

Ted Cruz.

Dinesh D’Souza.

Allen West.

Herman Cain.

Stacey Dash.

Thomas Sowell.

Walter Williams.

My black mentor.

Sheriff David Clarke.

Shelby Steele.

Michelle Malkin.

And if I were racist, why would I be so attracted to Kamala Harris, the Attorney General of California?  Or Halle Berry?  Or Jennifer Lopez?  Or Mariah Carey? Or Tamina Snuka (WWE)?  America Ferrera? Eva Longoria? Layla (formerly of WWE)? Gloria Estefan? Shakira? My ex girlfriend who's Cuban? Soledad O’Brien? Salma Hayek? And countless others that are in the Hartford CT area, including the first woman I first had any true potential with who was a darker skinned Hispanic?

Last but not least: If it’s not racist for non-whites to complain about whites, it’s NOT racist for whites to complain about non-whites.  After all, it depends on the specifics of the complaint NOT the narrative!  Plus, just because you complain about a minority does NOT mean it’s racist!  There could very well be something to the complaint!  

Now for the flip-side of this:  What about white racism?  What about white extremists?

My answer:

1.)  For a long time, non whites have had the mic, so to speak.  It's our turn to speak.

2.)  I say the same about the KKK that I do about non-whites racism.

3.)  Just because I talk only about the transgressions of non-whites on this post does NOT mean that I'm ignoring the transgressions of whites. It means I am currently focusing on what you do.  Don't like that?  Then do something within the minority community to fight the transgressions I and others will mention.