Guns don't have motivations… what a strange concept that would be!

Guns don't have motivations nor intentions, so there is no way they would know what to do (or not do) in any given situation. It's the people who are either killers or not.

The people are the ones who pull the trigger.

The people are the ones who pick up the gun.

The people are the ones who, once the gun is picked up, move around with it.

The guns don't do that.  They can't do that.  It's impossible.

When there is a killing, it's the person who does it.  The gun does not make the decision to pull the trigger.




For more of my thoughts on this topic, please click here:

Guns cannot pull their own triggers

When to think about the next election & the one after that

"The time to start thinking about the next election is now. It doesn't matter whether the vote is next month or next year. Whether the vote is a year away or four, start preparing now, because the Democrats already are."

-David Horowitz, from his book "How to Beat the Democrats and Other Subversive Ideas"

A creepy truth about Benghazi

Proe Graphique originally brought up the fact that I'm about to share with you now:

Benghazi is the first time a President of the United States, of all people (!!) has to be told to "Release the witness/survivors!"

It's awfully creepy when a regular person has to be told anything like that, but a President?  That's far beyond the normal level of creepy!

Something else that's bothersome is that the media played a huge role in him getting elected.  In my opinion, people propped up his Presidency.  Thus they played a huge role in such a thing needing to be said to a President.



For further reading on the subject of Benghazi:

OBAMA 'THREATENS FOX NEWS REPORTER'S CAREER'

HOW TO PROVE THAT OBAMA'S FATHER IS FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS, via Fair Use Act material

If you click on the text above, you'll come to a video with this as it's description:

Published on Sep 25, 2012

1/23/2014 UPDATE:

1. This video was created before the Nov 2012 election. However, as Obamacare tears this nation to pieces and Democrats run for political cover (a record number are resigning rather than face defeat in November), the GOP congress is getting more bold about questioning Obama's background. We feel this video is absolutely critical toward that end.

2. Many liberals have commented that morphing is not a "reliable" test of parentage. It is true insomuch as many children do not look like a combination of parents. However, to think that there is no extreme cause of suspicion about parentage when Mother & "mentor" Davis whom Obama spent his childhood morph and create essentially an identical image of Barack Obama's face, right down to a modified version of the fatty pouch under the bottom lip which was an extremely unusual feature in Davis. Why is this important? Because America cannot have a president ruining the country who has lied not only about what he will do, but who he even is.

3. Because Mother Dunham and father Davis were Americans does not mean Obama is eligible to be president. Too many people, including Obama's publishing rep (for 20 years), the Harvard law review and Michelle Obama and others who would know first-hand are on tape elsewhere on youtube claiming Obama was born in Kenya. If a Kenyan ( who abandoned Barack early on, understandable if Davis was the father) agreed to marry the Mother, the Mother must have needed some reason to go to Kenya. Selling the idea, in socially restrictive 1961, that Obama Sr was the father by giving birth to Barack in his home country would have been a natural course of action to avoid the societal stigma of giving birth to the baby of someone other than the husband. Obama is clearly the son of radical Communist Frank Marshal Davis and lied to America about it when running for office and is in all likelihood not even eligible to hold the position of President - meaning all law signed by Obama - including Obamacare - have never BEEN law and all soldiers killed when Obama sent them into battle (a now record number in Afghanistan) without authority would appear to legally constitute acts of murder (Imagine YOU dress up like a general, give orders, get people killed, get caught, and see what happens to you!)

4. "America's Sheriff" Joe Arpaio, 56 years law enforcement, 30 with the fed, 3,400 law enforcement people under him for his 5 million constituents had a team of experts check the birth certificate online for 6 months. Conclusion? Criminal forgery. Press ignores result AND now, Arpaio, formerly a regular on cable news talk shows. Massive cover-up - of that story, at least. Of that there can be no question.

** End update** Original follows:

IF YOU FEEL THIS VIDEO IS IMPORTANT, PLEASE SPREAD THE LINK AROUND ON TWITTER AND FACEBOOK. It only takes a minute. ALL COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL / IMAGES IN THIS VIDEO USED PER THE FAIR USE ACT and is presented here for educational purposes onl. All other rights reserved. The analysis and script are original to the video creator. WATCH THIS VIDEO and see how you can PROVE THAT OBAMA IS THE SON OF FBI-IDENTIFIED COMMUNIST FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS THE WAY THE FBI DOES THIS KIND OF THING.

EXAMPLES OF THE FBI USING FACIAL MORPHING. Example 1, a 2008 overview from the FBI website itself:
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/foren...

EXAMPLE 2 Morphing used in criminal forensics, particularly the famous Caylee Anthony murder:
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2...

EXAMPLE 3: FBI website, and 11-year-old story that approaches the situation similarly but with more primitive tools and an indicator of how long this kind of thing has been prevalent.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/foren...

EXAMPLE 4, similar to example 3, but one year old and more complex descriptions
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/foren...

EXAMPLE 5; here is a whole page of morphing software geared and marketed to the law enforcement market
http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/faci...

Now don't get me wrong, I don't expect a single liberal to say "My God, it's true!" because they are not interested in the truth, the liberals commenting here are interested in hiding and mocking down any truth that is politically dangerous for Obama. But OTHERS may want to know that this is legit.

(Please note that I take zero credit for anything you read on this particular blog entry.  100% credit goes to Proe Graphique who runs the blog Benghazi Truth, which can be found by clicking here.) 

Politicians are public servants & should serve We The People

To all politicians on the local, state & federal level:

You are public servants. The best way to serve the public is to preserve, protect & defend the United States Constitution. That is your job, so do it!

Doing so will benefit the roughly 300 million people in the USA.  

A three word nickname for those millions is:

We The People.

Actions speak louder than words (updated: 2/18/14, at 10:55 am EST)

Actions speak louder than words. Actions = Actually saving America.

Words = ALL else!

Every single person running for local, state and federal office as well as those already there need to understand, accept & implement this into not just their rhetoric but their actions as well.

1.)  One way to save & protect America?  Protect the power grid!

Center For Security Policy's Frank Gaffney discusses dangers of an electromagnetic pulse attack on the US power grid

2.)  Another way to save & protect America: Stop the insane level of spending!  

I have a saying that goes with this one:

"If it's smart for individuals to live within their means, families to live within their means and businesses to function within their means, why not the gov't as well?"

3.)  So far, over a hundred Reps have cosponsored HRes442 STOPres.  The rest of the Reps need to as well.  Doing so would show me and my fellow Americans that they understand my extension of the saying "actions speak louder than words" above. 

For those of you who'd like to see the text of HRes 442, click here.

After all, like I say in another blog entry on here regarding our elected officials aka public servants: "The best way to serve the public is to preserve, protect & defend the United States Constitution." ETC.


Update 2/18/14 10:55 am:  Here is a Breitbart article that talks about how "Over 100 GOP reps file resolution to restrict Obama's executive overreach."  The Tea Party Fire Ants, of which I am a PROUD member, contributed to that huge number of cosponsors to Rep Tom Rice's HRes442.  The leader of that group understands my extension of the "Actions speak louder than words" saying very well.

Fundamental mistakes made re Obamacare website

I remember someone saying something along the lines of “The website may not work, but Obamacare does.” I can’t remember if it was Pelosi or Obama himself. Maybe it was someone else.

My response to whoever it was is all of what appears below:

1.) You had the money to get it right the first time.
2.) You had the resources to find the very best people to set up the website the first time.
3.) You had a couple of years to do all this.

If you’re gonna brag about something being so great, why on earth would you make those three very fundamental mistakes I mention above?

I would think that you’d make every effort to get all aspects of this entire issue right the first time.
Something else I just thought of:

Nancy Pelosi said that we had to pass it to find out what’s in it.

No. You read something to find out what’s in it. We’re talking about something that will affect American lives. That’s 300 MILLION (approx) of us. Reading something before passage, in light of millions of lives being affected, is fundamentally important and 100% necessary.

Would a book publisher go publish something before they knew what was in it? Nope.

Passing something to find out what’s in it and publishing something before you’ve edited it both have one major thing in common: Doing so allows for many more mistakes to go unnoticed until unacceptable damage is done.

Of course, if you already knew what was in it before you passed it but said to us “pass it to find out what’s in it,” that right there is a red flag that you’re full of BS on the entire Obamacare law.

Political Correctness from Democrats & Republicans

I am sick of political correctness.

I'm not referring to the particular issues.  

I'm referring to how the freedom of speech on such issues is handled.

I'm referring to how legal battles regarding freedom of speech on such issues are handled.

Etc.

There is a distinction between what your beliefs are and how you're a representative of those beliefs.

When I was growing up, my mother always used to say "It's not what you say, it's how you say it."

Let me extend that a little further:

"It's not what you say, it's how you say it & how you represent your beliefs in whatever forum you're in at any given time."  That's to say, wherever you are, you're a representative of your belief system.

As such, representing your beliefs by advocating for the restriction of others speech is a very very bad thing (insert adjective here).

Just think, if the people who want to restrict your speech are all that's left one day, they'll have to live amongst their own, kind of like a dysfunctional family under one roof.  Some of them have super sensitive egos, some of them will exaggerate their claims & some of them will be extremely bitter.   

To think of them ruling over people such as themselves gives me a headache.